Thursday, November 26, 2009

A year after 26/11


Saswat Panigrahi
It’s been a year. The scars of a 60-hour-long terror seize which scripted a gory tale in blood is very much alive. The fidayeen attacks were coordinated shootings and bombings on multiple targets across India’s financial capital unleashed by Pakistan based jihadi elements.

The attacks took place at Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, the Oberoi Trident, the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower, Leopold Cafe, Cama Hospital, Nariman House, Metro Cinema and a lane behind the Times of India building and St. Xavier's College. There was also an explosion at Mazagaon, in Mumbai's port area, and another in a taxi at Vile Parle.

The unprecedented terror strikes, which shook India and startled the world, started on November 26 2008 and ended on November 29, 2008, snuffed out the lives of at least 166 innocent people and wounded more then 300. Among the dead were 136 Indians and 28 foreign nationals from 10 countries.

Mumbai police, Rapid Action Force personnel, Marine commandos and National Security Guards commandos performed with remarkable bravery and professionalism in their battle with the terrorists. 15 policemen and two NSG commandos sacrificed their lives in the counter-offensive. Assistant Police Sub-Inspector Tukaram Omble, who succeeded in capturing a terrorist alive, Mumbai Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) Chief Hemant Karkare, Additional Commissioner of Police Ashok Kamte, Encounter Specialist Vijay Salaskar, Senior Inspector Shashank Shinde were among the 15 policemen killed in the operation. NSG Commandos Major Sandeep Unnikrishnan, Hawaldar Gajendra Singh were also killed during the counter-offensive.

What may be the most well-documented terror strikes of the recent times, the attacks which were carried out by ten trained Pakistani young jihadis, were meticulously planned several months ahead of time. The attacks were executed by the Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) inside Pakistan. Reports say former officials from the Pakistani Army and its ace intelligence service Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) helped training the Mumbai attackers. The sophistication in the design of the terror strike also clearly points to an official backing from Pakistani agencies. However, a possible involvement of local elements in the role of facilitators can’t be ruled out.

Indian investigations reveal that the ten jihadis, who traveled to Mumbai from Karachi via Porbandar across the Arabian Sea, hijacked Indian fishing trawler 'Kuber', killed the crew and entered Mumbai on a rubber dinghy. They have a detailed lay out plans of their targets. To navigate to Mumbai by sea and to find their targets, the terrorists used Global Positioning System handsets. They also used Google Earth to familiarise themselves with the locations of their targets. Moreover, the attackers were constantly directed by handlers from inside Pakistan via mobile phones and Voice over Internet Protocol.

The investigation further reveals that each jihadi carried a dozen hand grenades, a 9 mm handgun with two 18-round clips and an AK-47, seven to nine 30-round magazines and more than 100 rounds of loose ammunition. Each attacker also carried a 17.6-pound (8 kg) bomb. Type 86 Grenades made by China's state-owned Norinco were used in the attacks.

Reports say the terrorists used at least three SIM cards purchased on the Indian side of the border with Bangladesh, pointing to a local involvement. Reports further suggest that one SIM card was purchased in New Jersey, US.

Blood tests of the jihadis indicate that they had taken cocaine, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide drugs and steroids during the attacks to sustain their energy for long hours.

Investigations revealed that the attackers were in their twenties. Nine of the ten attackers were from the Pakistan’s Punjab province, one was from the North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan. Nine of the ten gunmen were shot dead during the counter offensive by security forces and Ajmal Amir Kasab, the lone terrorist, who was captured alive, is now facing the trail.

After a series of denials to India’s dossier on Mumabi attacks, Pakistan which continues to be a safe heaven for terrorists buckled under tremendous international pressure. Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik finally agreed that "some part of the conspiracy" did take place in Pakistan and promised to bring the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks to justice.

The Pakistani authorities have also admitted to their Indian counterparts that the LeT plotted and financed the attacks. Pakistani investigations conducted on LeT camps in Karachi and Thatta revealed diaries, training manuals, maps of India and operational instructions relating to 26/11. "The investigation has established beyond any reasonable doubt that the defunct LeT activists conspired, abetted, planned, financed and established [the] communication network to carry out terror attacks in Mumbai," said a report from Pakistani investigators to Indian authorities.

However, Pakistan which is not abandoning its policy on supporting terror groups, has come up short of Hafiz Saeed, the founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba, believed to be the mastermind of terrorist siege of Mumbai. Saeed, against whom an international arrest warrant was issued by Interpol, was freed by a Pakistani court from detention on the ground that the Pakistani Government did not have enough evidence against him, outlining Islamabad's lack of seriousness in its ‘commitment’ to bring the perpetrators of the carnage to justice.

But an ‘under-the-table’ diplomacy of the Congress-led UPA Government has failed to bend Pakistan. Moreover, it had shocked the nation by delinking terrorism from composite dialogue in the Sharm el-Sheikh Indo-Pak joint statement, issued by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Pakistani counterpart Yousuf Raza Gilani in July last, replicating a Charles De Gaulle line. It is to recall that after 26/11, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had categorically stated that there was no question of holding dialogue with Pakistan unless it gives enough proof of taking action against its nationals who masterminded Mumbai attacks, and initiate steps to dismantle the terror infrastructure on its soil.

In the recent months disclose, David Coleman Headley, an American citizen of Pakistani origin, his associate Tahawwur Rana, another Pakistani origin Canadian citizen, both currently in FBI custody in the US are believed to have played a key role in the Mumbai attacks and were also plotting similar terror strikes in strategic locations of the country including the prestigious National Defence College in New Delhi. There are reports which also suggest Headley’s link to Bollywood. Reports also indicate that the notorious Pakistani intelligence agency ISI could be linked to Headley. Meanwhile, an official inquiry in New Delhi has revealed that the Consulate General of India in Chicago had issued multiple entry visas to Rana and his wife under the ‘discretionary quota’ in October 2008, outlining a major security lapse.

On the eve of the first anniversary of 26/11, a Pakistani anti-terror court has indicted LeT's operations commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and six others for involvement in the Mumbai attacks and declared 16 people, including Ajmal Amir Kasab, as proclaimed offenders. In a related development, Pakistan has also confirmed that a retired army major had been arrested for his alleged links with Headley and Rana.

At a time the country is paying tribute to the heroes and victims of Mumbai terror attacks, let’s discuss the naked truth. 26/11 has laid thread bare an abysmal intelligence and a spineless security, which helped the terror seize to succeed. Further, there are questions which will continue to haunt the Government. How bullets traversed through the bullet-proof jacket of three top Mumbai cops ATS Chief Hemant Karkare, ACP Ashok Kamte, Encounter Specialist Vijay Salaskar? Karkare’s bullet-proof jacket is reportedly goes missing, so as the file on the procurement of those jackets. An inept RR Patil, ‘famous’ for his utterly ridicules remark right after the terror seize -- “Bade shehron mein aisi choti baatein hoti rehti hai” -- got back to his old portfolio of Maharashtra Home Minister. Reports suggest that the cost of keeping the lone gun man Kasab alive is as much as Rs 31 crore and counting. A year after 26/11 when PM Manmohan Singh is having a ‘lavish and extravagant’ dinner at the White House, rehabilitation still elude more then two-thirds of the victims and their families.

Rightly says, Army Chief Gen Deepak Kapoor, "The US has not allowed a second 9/11 to happen, Indonesia has not allowed a second Bali-bombing to happen. India has allowed people to get away after the Parliament attack, Delhi blasts and finally the 26/11 incident. The time for all of us has come to say no more.”

However, in the larger reckoning, the problem remains. India is being systematically targeted by jihadi elements. One year on, is India alert and prepared to thrwart future terror attacks?

Monday, November 9, 2009

Looking back at Kandhamal


Saswat Panigrahi

A year after Kandha tribals erupted in fury, the real issues behind the conflict remain unaddressed. An indifferent Orissa Government refuses to recognise the reality

One year on, the agony of Kandhamal is refusing to simmer down. At a time when Kandhamal’s real problems are being disregarded and there is a deliberate miscalculation in handling the crisis by secular fundamentalist media and political parties which pin blame on ‘Hindu groups’, comes a report which not only exposes the allegations against the much-touted ‘Hindu hand’ but also depicts the authentic source of tribal anger.

The report, titled Kandhamal: A Fact File by Michael Parker, published by India Foundation, reveals that the violent upheaval in Kandhamal is rooted in its socio-demographic history. Parker is a Washington based researcher of ancient indigenous cultures of the world and their role in a globalised society. “A social chaos, similar to that experienced by American tribes threatened the cultural stability of the entire region,” the report says.

Kandhamal has two distinct inhabitants -- the tribal Kandhas and the Schedule Caste Panas - their relations have a history of turbulence and the report has brought its genesis. It was during the British period the Panas made a ‘momentous choice’ of coming closer to the Christian missionary and eventually converted to the Christianity. However, for Kandhas, Christianity was closely identified with the British colonial powers that they have battled in at least eight different wars.

The problem arises, says the report, when Christian Panas are unwilling to forgo the benefits of being a member of Scheduled Caste. “Not only have the Christian Panas obscured their religious identities as Christians, they have submitted fake certificates identifying themselves as members of the Kandha tribal community,” the report says. These certificates are used to usurp land, Govt jobs and academic opportunities reserved for the Kandhas. Alienation of tribal land is the foundation of the Kandha-Pana turmoil. “Kandhas were blatantly disinherited from their lands for generations,” the report says adding, “Another major complication related to the land issue is that posed by Christians use of encroached lands to build churches.” Despite Indian law prohibits sale of tribal land to non-tribals, Odisha Government official report says 52 per cent of Kandhas own less than 10 per sent of the land in the district.

“Adding yet another layer of turmoil to the situation, the Christian Panas began a movement demanding official recognition as a Schedule Tribe,” the report says on Kui controversy. Kui is the native language of Kandhas. The amended central Scheduled Tribe list included the ‘Kui community’ in the ST category. Parker report quotes two schools of thoughts in dealing with the controversy. A section of experts on tribal affairs says Kui means Kandha and there is no need to add Kui in the Central Scheduled Tribe list, where as another section says the word Kui is used not in terms of language but in reference to a tribe.

“The records and the facts prove that Panas are not and have never been a tribe in accordance to the guidelines set by the Indian Constitution,” Parker says.

“Thus the Kandhas are understandably in an uproar over the loss of opportunity. A system that was designed to alleviate their poverty and social stagnation has been hijacked and their woes compounded,” the report states. “The dire consequences of a trauma denied and unresolved are always sudden and explosives…It is obvious that it is a primary cause of the turmoil at the heart of Kandhamal’s crisis,” it observes.

Another ominous side of Kandha-Pana divide, as brought out by the report is the shadow of the Maoists in the region, who take advantage of the situation. “The tension between the Christian Panas and Kandhas is so tangible that it has been identified as a strategic opportunity for the Maoists,” the report says. It further adds, “The enmity between the Maoists and Kandhas (after Kandha’s 2002 declaration of war against Maoists) created the dynamic for a Maoist-Christian Pana alliance.” This provides the Maoists a reliable source of recruits. And from the Christian Pana perspective the Maoists became a powerful weapon to use against the Kandhas.

The report has taken note of foreign sources of funding which continue to pour into Christian coffers. The Odisha Government record says an amount of Rs 4,215, 585,000 (approximately $100 million) of foreign funds went to such groups from 1999 to 2003 which are allegedly being used to convert people away from their native faiths.

The report quoted the documental evidence of the murder conspiracy of Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati, who fought against fraudulent conversion and cow-slaughter, by the evangelists, uncovered by Ashok Sahu, senior Odisha BJP leader and former Assam ADGP.

“He was attacked on multiple occasions and it was a common knowledge that every attack had been at the hands of the Christian extremist,” the report says, adding “The Swami appears to have been killed by a conspiratorial alliance of Pana Christians and Maoists.”

The Congress-led UPA did not pay heed to the request of Odisha Government to control the violence that followed the Swami’s killing, the report says. “As violence swept across Kandhamal the Government of Odisha issued an official request for assistance from the Central Government of India. The Congress controlled UPA Government refused to cooperate. The State of Odisha was subsequently obliged to file a petition with the Courts. Only after the judicial branch ordered the Central Government to provide assistance, were peacekeeping forces sent and funds allocated towards the State’s request,” it says.

The report has also brought out the State of Odisha’s miscalculation in handling the emergency that followed the violence in which both Kandhas and Panas were affected. “As Pana Christians sat cozily in relief camps getting food, medicine and shelter, the Kandha had no refuge or food,” it says. Deprived of the relief the Kandhas took shelter in jungle. “Kandhas were arrested arbitrarily. Daily labourers and wage earners remained hungry and tribal women rallied for relief….Night raids and arrests on trumped up charges based solely on Christian Pana complaints combined with allegations of sexual harassment of Kandha women, theft, raids on livestock and food by CRPF troops had the Kandhas up in arms,” the report adds.

Further, the report has brought out the Kandhamal nun rape accusation and media’s ‘carte blanche’ acceptance while promoting the allegations as proven facts. Parker has raised some moot questions in his report that suggest that the claims of the nun were in a constant state of flux. In her initial complaint the nun did not mention the rape, but it was added to her testimony a full 24 hours later. Forensic evidence revealed that the nun was sexually active, no vaginal injuries signifying rape was found yet semen was recovered and no evidence of rape was found upon the clothes of the nun in the tests conducted by Odisha State Forensic Science Lab.

“The media, rather than relying in facts, went overboard in misinterpreting the case and the creation of an alternative reality that fit their pre conceived agendas,” Parker says.

India has survived repeated onslaughts of foreign forces. Kandhamal is an example. There was an international conspiracy to defame Odisha and India. In Parker’s word, “Various Leftists commentators, empowered by the Globalist-controlled media outlets added their illogical rationales to India’s anti-indigenous combine. It has been suggested that some among these powers have a definite role to play in the Kandhamal violence.” Time will reveal the conspiratorial roles in Kandhamal mayhem.

-- This is an extended version of the article published in the Op-Ed page of The Pioneer on November 9, 2009

Also read: